"Youth Dissent at Jantar Mantar Revives Debate on Civil Disobedience"
Civil Disobedience
deliberate, non-violent breach of an unjust law, accepting legal consequences as moral demonstration.
Article 19(1)(b)
fundamental right of citizens to assemble peaceably and without arms.
The right to peaceful assembly is guaranteed under Article 19(1)(b) of the Constitution of India as a fundamental right available to all citizens. This right is not absolute: Article 19(3) empowers the state to impose reasonable restrictions in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India or public order. The constitutional design deliberately creates a tension — the state may regulate, but may not extinguish, the right to assemble. The Supreme Court has consistently upheld this balance, most notably in Ramlila Maidan Incident v. Home Secretary, Union of India (2012), where it held that citizens possess a fundamental right to peaceful assembly and that the state must exercise restraint before dispersing such gatherings.
The tradition of organised public protest in India is as old as the republic itself, rooted in the Gandhian doctrine of satyagraha — non-violent resistance grounded in moral truth. The framers of the Constitution, many of whom were veterans of colonial-era civil disobedience, deliberately embedded protest rights into the fundamental rights chapter, recognising that the street and the legislature must remain connected. Designated protest sites such as Jantar Mantar in New Delhi and Azad Maidan in Mumbai exist precisely to channel this democratic energy into a regulated, visible, and constitutionally protected space.
Parliamentary democracy adds a second layer of accountability: under Article 75(3), the Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha. When public grievances cannot find expression through parliamentary instruments — Question Hour, adjournment motions, or notices under Rule 267 (Rajya Sabha) and Rule 184 (Lok Sabha) — citizens are left with the street as the only remaining forum. The health of a democracy is therefore measured not just by whether protests are permitted, but by whether the institutions that should respond to them actually do.
Civil disobedience, as a concept, occupies a distinct moral space between lawful protest and outright rebellion. It is the deliberate, non-violent violation of a law or policy perceived as unjust, with the protester accepting legal consequences as a demonstration of moral seriousness. The philosophical lineage runs from Henry David Thoreau through Mahatma Gandhi to the global civil rights movements of the twentieth century. In the Indian constitutional context, civil disobedience is not itself a fundamental right — the right guaranteed is to peaceful assembly, not to law-breaking — but courts have recognised that the spirit of dissent is integral to democratic culture.
The article's invocation of the Mandal Commission protests of 1990 is instructive. The Mandal Commission, formally the Second Backward Classes Commission, recommended 27 percent reservation for Other Backward Classes in central government jobs. The protests that followed — including acts of self-immolation — illustrated how deeply reservation policy intersects with questions of caste, merit, and historical justice. …
Democracy's superior virtue lies in the fact that it calls into activity
Which one of the following factors constitutes the best safeguard of liberty in a liberal democracy?
Which one of the following reflects the most appropriate relationship between law and liberty ?
With reference to the Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992) judgment, which of the following is/are correct?
1.It upheld 27 percent reservation for Other Backward Classes in central government jobs.
2.It capped total reservations (SC + ST + OBC) at 50 percent.
3.It held that the 'creamy layer' among OBCs should be excluded from reservation benefits.
4.It extended reservations to promotions in government services.
Which of the following parliamentary instruments is specifically associated with raising matters of urgent public importance in the Rajya Sabha by suspending the listed business of the day?
Want the full note, Prelims Facts & MCQ answers?
Create a free account — takes less than a minute.
Create free account