SocietyGS2

National survey finds zero manual scavengers; sewer deaths and FIRs persist

PIB·2026-08-06· Read original

"National survey finds zero manual scavengers; sewer deaths and FIRs persist"

Prelims Facts

  • •MS Act, 2013 replaced the Employment of Manual Scavengers and Construction of Dry Latrines (Prohibition) Act, 1993
  • •58,098 manual scavengers were identified through nationwide surveys conducted in 2013 and 2018; all received One-Time Cash Assistance of ₹40,000 each
+4 more facts — sign up free to unlock

Key Terms

Manual Scavenging

manually cleaning, carrying, or disposing of human excreta from latrines, drains, or sewers, typically by caste-designated communities

MS Act, 2013

Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act; bans insanitary latrines and hazardous sewer cleaning without equipment

+4 more terms — sign up free to unlock

Study Note

BackgroundCore Concept

Background

Manual scavenging — the caste-based practice of manually cleaning, carrying, or disposing of human excreta from dry latrines, open drains, railway tracks, and sewers — is one of India's most persistent forms of occupational discrimination rooted in the caste hierarchy. It directly violates Articles 14, 17, and 21 of the Constitution: Article 17 abolishes untouchability, and the Supreme Court has held that compelling individuals to perform manual scavenging constitutes untouchability in practice.

The first legislative attempt at prohibition was the Employment of Manual Scavengers and Construction of Dry Latrines (Prohibition) Act, 1993, which proved largely ineffective due to a narrow definition, weak enforcement, and the exclusion of sewer and septic tank cleaning from its ambit. Parliament replaced it with the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act, 2013 (MS Act, 2013) — a substantially stronger law that broadened the definition of manual scavenging, mandated local-authority surveys, established rehabilitation entitlements (cash assistance, scholarships, housing, and livelihood training), and created criminal penalties for violations. The Supreme Court's judgment in Safai Karamchari Andolan v. Union of India (2014) reinforced the state's obligation to identify, rehabilitate, and compensate manual scavengers and the families of those who died in sewer accidents.

The Topic Explained

The MS Act, 2013 is the cornerstone legislation. It prohibits the construction or maintenance of insanitary latrines — those requiring manual cleaning of human waste — and bans the engagement of any person for hazardous manual cleaning of sewers and septic tanks without protective gear and safety equipment. The Act mandates that every local authority conduct surveys to identify manual scavengers and that identified persons be offered rehabilitation through a one-time cash assistance, access to alternative livelihoods, skill training, and capital subsidies.

The earlier Self Employment Scheme for Rehabilitation of Manual Scavengers (SRMS) provided these rehabilitation benefits but was limited in scope and reach. It has since been subsumed into the National Action for Mechanised Sanitation Ecosystem (NAMASTE) Scheme, launched in July 2023 under the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment in collaboration with the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs. …

Sign up free to read the full noteIncludes the rest of The Topic Explained and Current Context

Related PYQs

2016GS1 Prelims

'Rashtriya Garima Abhiyaan' is a national campaign to

Arehabilitate the homeless and destitute persons and provide them with suitable sources of livelihood
Brelease the sex workers from their practice and provide them with alternative sources of livelihood
Ceradicate the practice of manual scavenging and rehabilitate the manual scavengers
Drelease the bonded labourers from their bondage and rehabilitate them
Sign up free to see the answer and explanation

Practice MCQs

Societymedium

With reference to the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act, 2013, consider the following statements:

1.It replaced the Employment of Manual Scavengers and Construction of Dry Latrines (Prohibition) Act, 1993.

2.It restricts the definition of manual scavenging to the cleaning of dry latrines only, excluding sewers and septic tanks.

3.It mandates local authorities to conduct surveys to identify manual scavengers within their jurisdiction.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

A1 and 2 only
B1 and 3 only
C2 and 3 only
D1, 2 and 3
Sign up to check your answer & see the explanation
Societymedium

The NAMASTE Scheme, launched in 2023, is jointly implemented by which of the following ministries?

AMinistry of Social Justice and Empowerment, and Ministry of Jal Shakti
BMinistry of Social Justice and Empowerment, and Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs
CMinistry of Labour and Employment, and Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs
DMinistry of Rural Development, and Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment
Sign up to check your answer & see the explanation
Societyeasy

Which of the following best describes the One-Time Cash Assistance (OTCA) provided under the rehabilitation framework for manual scavengers?

A₹10,000 paid to each identified manual scavenger as an emergency relief measure
B₹40,000 paid to each identified manual scavenger as part of rehabilitation entitlements
C₹1,00,000 paid to families of sanitation workers who died in sewer accidents
D₹40,000 paid annually to each registered sanitation worker under the NAMASTE Scheme
Sign up to check your answer & see the explanation

Want the full note, Prelims Facts & MCQ answers?

Create a free account — takes less than a minute.

Create free account