EconomyGS2+ GS3

Proposed NFSA Amendment Shifts AAY to Per-Capita Model, Cutting Poorest Entitlements

Indian Express·2026-08-09· Read original

"Proposed NFSA Amendment Shifts AAY to Per-Capita Model, Cutting Poorest Entitlements"

Prelims Facts

  • •NFSA 2013 covers approximately two-thirds of India's population through the PDS, divided into AAY and Priority Household (PHH) categories.
  • •AAY entitlement: 35 kg of foodgrains per household per month (flat); PHH entitlement: 5 kg per person per month.
+4 more facts — sign up free to unlock

Key Terms

Antyodaya Anna Yojana (AAY)

PDS sub-scheme targeting the 'poorest of the poor'; provides 35 kg foodgrains per household monthly.

Priority Households (PHH)

NFSA category below AAY; entitled to 5 kg foodgrains per person per month.

+4 more terms — sign up free to unlock

Study Note

BackgroundCore Concept

Background

The National Food Security Act (NFSA), 2013 provides a statutory right to subsidised foodgrains to approximately two-thirds of India's population through the Public Distribution System (PDS). The Act created two beneficiary categories: Priority Households (PHH), entitled to 5 kg of foodgrains per person per month, and Antyodaya Anna Yojana (AAY) households, entitled to a fixed 35 kg per household per month irrespective of household size. The AAY programme itself predates the NFSA — it was launched in late 2000 to provide special protection to the poorest of the poor, with beneficiaries originally identified by local communities without rigid criteria. The Supreme Court subsequently provided a framework, directing that Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs) and households with no earning member — widows living alone, elderly couples, disabled persons without support — be covered under AAY. Under the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Anna Yojana (PMGKAY), AAY rations are currently provided free of cost.

The NFSA's design deliberately retained the household-based entitlement for AAY while shifting PHH to a per-capita model. The rationale was protective: AAY households disproportionately consist of small, fragile households — a widow living alone, an elderly couple — who would suffer severe absolute losses if their entitlement were recalculated on a per-person basis. The household floor of 35 kg thus functioned as an economic safety net, not merely a food ration.

The Topic Explained

The structural distinction between AAY and PHH categories under the NFSA is central to understanding the proposed amendment. PHH beneficiaries receive 5 kg per capita per month, while AAY households receive a flat 35 kg per household per month — a design that implicitly cross-subsidises smaller households within the AAY category. The Section 3 of the NFSA, which governs these entitlements, is the provision the proposed amendment targets.

The proposed amendment would replace the flat 35 kg household entitlement with a per-capita model of 7 kg per person per month, subject to a ceiling of 35 kg per household. For households with five or more members, the change is neutral. For smaller households — a single woman, a couple, a household of three — the reduction is severe: a solo woman's entitlement would fall from 35 kg to 7 kg, an 80 per cent reduction. …

Sign up free to read the full noteIncludes the rest of The Topic Explained and Current Context

Related PYQs

2018GS1 Prelims

With reference to the provisions made under the National Food Security Act, 2013, consider the following statements :

1.The families coming under the category of 'below poverty line (BPL)' only are eligible to receive subsidised food grains.

2.The eldest woman in a household, of age 18 years or above, shall be the head of the household for the purpose of issuance of a ration card.

3.Pregnant women and lactating mothers are entitled to a 'take-home ration' of 1600 calories per day during pregnancy and for six months thereafter.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

A1 and 2
B2 only
C1 and 3
D3 only
Sign up free to see the answer and explanation

Practice MCQs

Politymedium

With reference to the Antyodaya Anna Yojana (AAY) under the National Food Security Act, 2013, consider the following statements:

1.AAY households are entitled to a fixed 35 kg of foodgrains per household per month, irrespective of household size.

2.The proposed amendment to Section 3 of the NFSA retains the household floor but increases the per-capita entitlement to 7 kg.

3.According to HCES 2023-24, a majority of AAY households have fewer than five members.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

A1 only
B1 and 3 only
C2 and 3 only
D1, 2 and 3
Sign up to check your answer & see the explanation
Politymedium

Assertion (A): The Antyodaya Anna Yojana retained a household-based entitlement even after the NFSA 2013 shifted Priority Households to a per-capita model.

Reason (R): AAY households disproportionately consist of small households with no earning member, who would suffer severe absolute losses under a per-capita entitlement system.

Which of the following is correct?

ABoth A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
BBoth A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
CA is true but R is false
DA is false but R is true
Sign up to check your answer & see the explanation

Want the full note, Prelims Facts & MCQ answers?

Create a free account — takes less than a minute.

Create free account