"Gender equality promise tested as women protesters face doxxing and online abuse"
Universal Adult Franchise
the right of every adult citizen to vote, regardless of gender, caste, or property, granted in India from 1952.
Doxxing
deliberate online publication of a private individual's personal details to expose them to targeted harassment.
The promise of gender equality in India is not a recent policy aspiration — it is a founding constitutional commitment. The Constituent Assembly, drafting the Constitution against the backdrop of Partition, mass poverty, and social fragmentation, chose to enshrine equality before the law under Articles 14, 15, and 16, making India one of the earliest post-colonial democracies to guarantee universal adult franchise without any gender qualification. This was a radical departure from global norms: Switzerland, for instance, did not extend the right to vote to all women until 1990. The decision to grant every Indian above the age of 21 the right to vote in the first general elections of 1952 was, in the context of the time, an act of extraordinary political faith.
The constitutional framework was supplemented over decades by statutory reform. The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, granted daughters equal coparcenary rights in ancestral property, closing a major legal gap in inheritance law. Article 39(d) directs the state to ensure equal pay for equal work. Yet, as NCERT's political theory framework notes, formal legal equality — equality before the law — is a necessary but not sufficient condition for substantive equality. The distance between constitutional text and lived social reality has remained a defining tension in India's democratic project.
The 1952 voter registration exercise is a foundational episode in India's gender-equality history. When the Election Commission of India fanned out to register approximately 80 million eligible women voters, it encountered a structural social barrier: women routinely identified themselves as 'daughter of X' or 'wife of Y' rather than by their own names. The Commission's workers persisted in registering each woman as an individual in her own right — a task that was simultaneously administrative and deeply political. Despite these efforts, 2.8 million women were struck off the electoral rolls because they refused to be identified by their own names. This figure is not merely a historical curiosity; it is a baseline measure of how deeply patriarchal norms were embedded in public life at independence. …
One of the implications of equality in society is the absence of
Which one of the following categories of Fundamental Rights incorporates protection against untouchability as a form of discrimination?
Democracy's superior virtue lies in the fact that it calls into activity
In the context of Indian history, the Rakhmabai case of 1884 revolved around
1.women's right to gain education
2.age of consent
3.restitution of conjugal rights
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
Which of the following best describes the concept of 'doxxing' in the context of digital rights and women's political participation?
The Election Commission of India's voter registration drive before the 1952 general elections is historically significant primarily because:
Consider the following assertion and reason:
Assertion (A): Formal electoral equality — equal voting rights — does not automatically produce substantive gender equality in democratic participation.
Reason (R): India's voter turnout gender gap closed by 2019, yet women protesters continue to face gendered online harassment and paternalistic political discourse.
Which of the following is correct?
Want the full note, Prelims Facts & MCQ answers?
Create a free account — takes less than a minute.
Create free account