"Institutional codes of belonging undermine genuine meritocracy in Indian education"
Concurrent List
Seventh Schedule category where both Union and states can legislate; education falls here.
Article 21A
Fundamental Right to free and compulsory education for children aged 6–14, inserted by 86th Amendment.
India's higher education system is among the largest in the world by scale, encompassing central and state universities, deemed universities, autonomous colleges, and institutions of national importance. Education is a Concurrent List subject under the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution, meaning both Union and state governments share legislative authority — a division that has historically produced regulatory fragmentation and uneven quality. The constitutional right to education rests on Article 21A (inserted by the 86th Constitutional Amendment, 2002) and the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (RTE) Act, 2009, guaranteeing schooling up to age fourteen. Higher education, however, lacks an equivalent rights-based framework and is instead governed through overlapping bodies — the University Grants Commission (UGC), established under the UGC Act, 1956, the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), and various professional councils.
The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 sought to address systemic fragmentation by proposing a single overarching regulator, multidisciplinary curricula, and greater institutional autonomy. It also explicitly recognised that socioeconomic background, language, and geography have historically determined access to quality education. Article 46 of the Constitution further directs the state to promote educational and economic interests of weaker sections. Despite these frameworks, implementation of reform has remained uneven, and structural barriers persist well beyond the commonly cited problems of underfunding and poor infrastructure.
Analysts identify three interlocking conceptual barriers — intention, concept, and execution — as deeper constraints on higher education quality. Intention refers to the consistent prioritisation of merit, integrity, and institutional interest over patronage and favouritism. When appointments, promotions, and admissions are distorted by non-merit considerations, institutional culture is corroded from within, regardless of how well-designed the formal rules may be.
The second barrier concerns the concept of meritocracy itself. The idea that advancement should be determined by talent and effort alone has been central to India's post-independence educational imagination. Yet sociologists and policy analysts argue that what institutions measure as 'merit' is often inseparable from cultural capital — a concept developed by sociologist Pierre Bourdieu referring to non-financial social assets such as familiarity with elite institutions, command of prestige languages, and confidence in formal settings. …
What was the exact constitutional status of India on 26th January, 1950?
Which one of the following is not a feature of Indian federalism?
Which of the following constitutional provisions most directly obligates the Indian state to promote the educational interests of socially and economically disadvantaged groups?
The 86th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2002 is significant in the context of education in India because it:
Want the full note, Prelims Facts & MCQ answers?
Create a free account — takes less than a minute.
Create free account