PolityGS2

Supreme Court upholds hanging as constitutionally valid mode of execution

Indian Express·2026-08-20· Read original

"Supreme Court upholds hanging as constitutionally valid mode of execution"

Prelims Facts

  • •Section 393(5), BNSS, 2023: death sentence shall direct that the condemned 'be hanged by the neck till he is dead' — provision unchanged in substance since CrPC, 1861.
  • •Deena v. Union of India (1983): three-judge Supreme Court bench upheld constitutional validity of hanging; long-drop method targets fracture-dislocation at C2-C3 vertebrae.
+4 more facts — sign up free to unlock

Key Terms

Article 21

Fundamental right guaranteeing protection of life and personal liberty; judicially expanded to include dignitary rights.

Stare decisis

Doctrine requiring courts to follow precedents set by higher or co-equal benches.

+4 more terms — sign up free to unlock

Study Note

BackgroundCore Concept

Background

India's constitutional framework guarantees the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21, which the Supreme Court has progressively interpreted to include a cluster of dignitary rights — the right to live with dignity, the right to health, and, as affirmed in Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab (1996), the right to die with dignity. This expansive reading of Article 21 has formed the bedrock of challenges to the manner in which the State exercises its ultimate coercive power: the death penalty.

Capital punishment itself has survived constitutional scrutiny in India. In Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab (1980), a five-judge Constitution Bench upheld the death penalty as constitutional, confining its application to the 'rarest of rare' cases. The mode of execution, however, has been a separate and less-litigated question. Section 393(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 — carrying forward a provision virtually unchanged since its introduction in the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1861 — mandates that a death sentence be carried out by hanging the condemned person by the neck until dead. This provision has survived every constitutional challenge mounted against it, most notably in Deena v. Union of India (1983).

The Topic Explained

The constitutional validity of hanging as a mode of execution was definitively examined in Deena v. Union of India (1983), where a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court assessed medical evidence, expert opinion, and comparative execution methods from other jurisdictions. The Court held that hanging, when properly administered through the long-drop method — where the drop distance is calculated based on the condemned person's height and weight to cause a fracture-dislocation at the C2-C3 vertebrae — brings about near-instant unconsciousness and death. The Court concluded that this method does not inflict greater pain than other known methods and avoids 'barbarity, torture, and degradation,' thereby satisfying the Article 21 standard.

The Law Commission of India's 187th Report (2003), chaired by Justice M. …

Sign up free to read the full noteIncludes the rest of The Topic Explained and Current Context

Related PYQs

2017GS1 Prelims

In India, Judicial Review implies

Athe power of the Judiciary to pronounce upon the constitutionality of laws and executive orders.
Bthe power of the Judiciary to question the wisdom of the laws enacted by the Legislatures.
Cthe power of the Judiciary to review all the legislative enactments before they are assented to by the President.
Dthe power of the Judiciary to review its own judgements given earlier in similar or different cases.
Sign up free to see the answer and explanation
2017GS1 Prelims

Which one of the following statements is correct?

ARights are claims of the State against the citizens.
BRights are privileges which are incorporated in the Constitution of a State.
CRights are claims of the citizens against the State.
DRights are privileges of a few citizens against the many.
Sign up free to see the answer and explanation
2024GS1 Prelims

A Writ of Prohibition is an order issued by the Supreme Court or High Courts to:

Aa government officer prohibiting him from taking a particular action.
Bthe Parliament/Legislative Assembly to pass a law on Prohibition.
Cthe lower court prohibiting continuation of proceedings in a case.
Dthe Government prohibiting it from following an unconstitutional policy.
Sign up free to see the answer and explanation

Practice MCQs

Politymedium

Consider the following statements regarding the constitutional validity of hanging as a mode of execution in India:

1.The Supreme Court in Deena v. Union of India (1983) upheld hanging after examining medical evidence and held it does not violate Article 21.

2.The Law Commission's 187th Report recommended shooting as an alternative to hanging.

3.Section 393(5) of the BNSS, 2023 retains hanging as the prescribed mode of execution.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

A1 and 2 only
B1 and 3 only
C2 and 3 only
D1, 2 and 3
Sign up to check your answer & see the explanation
Politymedium

With reference to Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, which of the following propositions has the Supreme Court affirmed in its jurisprudence?

1.Article 21 includes the right to die with dignity.

2.Constitutional protection under Article 21 ceases to apply once a person is sentenced to death.

3.The right to life under Article 21 encompasses the right to a dignified procedure of execution.

Select the correct answer using the codes below:

A1 only
B1 and 3 only
C2 and 3 only
D1, 2 and 3
Sign up to check your answer & see the explanation
Politymedium

Assertion (A): The Supreme Court's recent ruling upholding hanging does not permanently foreclose future constitutional challenges to the method of execution.

Reason (R): The Court held that constitutional law evolves, and fundamentally new scientific or medical evidence could alter the assumptions on which the 1983 Deena judgment was decided.

Which one of the following is correct?

ABoth A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
BBoth A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A
CA is true but R is false
DA is false but R is true
Sign up to check your answer & see the explanation
Polityeasy

Which of the following correctly describes the legal status of Law Commission of India reports in the Indian constitutional framework?

AThey are binding on Parliament and must be enacted within a specified period.
BThey are binding on the executive but require parliamentary approval to become law.
CThey are recommendatory and do not bind Parliament or the executive.
DThey carry the force of delegated legislation once approved by the Union Cabinet.
Sign up to check your answer & see the explanation
Polityeasy

The doctrine of 'rarest of rare' in the context of capital punishment in India was established in which of the following cases?

ADeena v. Union of India (1983)
BGian Kaur v. State of Punjab (1996)
CBachan Singh v. State of Punjab (1980)
DManeka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978)
Sign up to check your answer & see the explanation

Want the full note, Prelims Facts & MCQ answers?

Create a free account — takes less than a minute.

Create free account