"Madhya Pradesh Court Withdraws Protection to Wildlife NGO Chief in Leopard Poaching Case"
Schedule I (WPA 1972)
Highest protection tier — hunting, possession, and trade of listed species absolutely prohibited anywhere in India.
Wildlife Crime Control Bureau (WCCB)
Statutory national body (est. 2007) coordinating wildlife crime enforcement and international liaison.
India's wildlife protection framework rests on the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 (WPA), which classifies species into six schedules based on conservation status. Species in Schedule I receive the highest level of protection: hunting, poaching, possession, and trade are absolutely prohibited, with the most severe penalties. Crucially, this protection applies equally inside and outside designated protected areas, a tiger or leopard killed in a revenue forest or farmland is as much a criminal offence as one killed inside a national park. The Indian Leopard (Panthera pardus fusca) is listed under Schedule I, placing it in the same protection tier as the tiger.
The constitutional basis for wildlife legislation lies in Entry 17B of the Concurrent List (inserted by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment, 1976), Article 48A (Directive Principle directing the state to protect the environment and wildlife), and Article 51A(g) (Fundamental Duty of every citizen to protect the natural environment). Enforcement is shared between State Forest Departments, the Wildlife Crime Control Bureau (WCCB), a statutory body under the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, established in 2007, and the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA), which is a statutory body constituted under the WPA itself (as amended in 2006). The 2022 amendment to the WPA restructured species schedules and tightened penalties, reflecting growing concern about organised wildlife crime.
India is also a signatory to CITES (the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora), which regulates cross-border trade in wildlife products. Leopard skins, bones, and other parts are listed under CITES Appendix I, meaning commercial trade is banned. Domestically, the WPA mirrors this by prohibiting any trade in Schedule I species or their derivatives. Madhya Pradesh, which has the largest area under permanent forests among all Indian states, is both a conservation success story and a recurring site of wildlife crime, given its dense network of tiger reserves, wildlife corridors, and forest-fringe communities.
The WPA 1972 creates a layered enforcement architecture. At the state level, State Forest Departments conduct frontline anti-poaching operations, often through specialised units. Madhya Pradesh operates the State Tiger Strike Force (STSF), a dedicated unit for wildlife crime investigation. At the national level, the WCCB coordinates intelligence, trains enforcement personnel, and liaises with INTERPOL and CITES authorities on cross-border wildlife trafficking. The NTCA oversees tiger reserve management and can direct states on conservation compliance.
The WPA defines offences broadly. Hunting includes not just killing but also capturing, poisoning, trapping, and even attempting any of these acts. Trade in wildlife articles, skins, bones, claws, or any derivative of a Schedule I species, is separately criminalised. Possession of such articles without a valid declaration is itself an offence. This means a wildlife crime investigation can span multiple accused parties: the hunter, the transporter, the trader, and anyone who facilitated or abetted the chain. …
With reference to Indian laws about wildlife protection, consider the following statements:
1.Wild animals are the sole property of the government.
2.When a wild animal is declared protected, such animal is entitled for equal protection whether it is found in protected areas or outside.
3.Apprehension of a protected wild animal becoming a danger to human life is sufficient ground for its capture or killing.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
In India, if a species of tortoise is declared protected under Schedule I of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, what does it imply?
Consider the following statements:
1.Animal Welfare Board of India is established under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
2.National Tiger Conservation Authority is a statutory body.
3.National Ganga River Basin Authority is chaired by the Prime Minister.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
With reference to the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, consider the following statements:
1.A species listed under Schedule I enjoys protection only within the boundaries of national parks and wildlife sanctuaries.
2.The National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) is a statutory body constituted under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972.
3.The Wildlife Crime Control Bureau (WCCB) was established under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Match the following wildlife enforcement bodies with their correct descriptions:
1.Wildlife Crime Control Bureau (WCCB) — (a) Statutory body under WPA 1972 (amended 2006) overseeing tiger reserve management
2.National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) — (b) National body coordinating wildlife crime enforcement, established in 2007
3.State Tiger Strike Force (STSF) — (c) State-level specialised unit for wildlife crime investigation
4.CITES Appendix I — (d) International list of species for which commercial cross-border trade is completely banned
Select the correct matching:
Consider the following statements regarding the constitutional basis for wildlife protection in India:
1.Entry 17B of the Concurrent List, which enables Parliament to legislate on wildlife protection, was inserted by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment.
2.Article 48A, a Directive Principle of State Policy, directs the state to protect and improve the environment and safeguard forests and wildlife.
3.Protection of wildlife is listed as a Fundamental Right under Article 21 of the Constitution.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
With reference to the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, which of the following is/are correct?
1.'Hunting' under the Act includes not only killing but also capturing, poisoning, trapping, or attempting any of these acts.
2.Possession of a Schedule I species' derivative (such as a skin or bone) without a valid declaration is itself an offence under the Act.
3.A person can be prosecuted for abetment of poaching only if they were physically present at the site of the offence.
Select the correct answer using the codes below:
Consider the following pairs:
International Convention / List — Subject Matter
1.CITES Appendix I — Species for which commercial international trade is completely banned
2.CITES Appendix II — Species not necessarily threatened but whose trade must be controlled
3.Ramsar Convention — Protection of migratory species and their habitats
How many of the above pairs are correctly matched?
Want the full note, Prelims Facts & MCQ answers?
Create a free account — takes less than a minute.
Create free account