"BNS Section 106(2) on Hit-and-Run Remains Uncommenced Despite Parliamentary Intent"
Commencement notification
a government notification that brings a legislated provision into legal force on a specified date; without it, the provision exists on paper but cannot be applied.
Rash and negligent driving
driving without due care or with reckless disregard for others' safety; the basis for Sections 281 and 106 of the BNS.
India's criminal law underwent a major overhaul when the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 replaced the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Most provisions of the BNS came into force on 1 July 2024. The new code retained many IPC offences but also introduced or restructured several provisions, including those dealing with road accidents and negligent driving. Parliament's intent was to make the law more responsive to modern realities, including the specific problem of drivers fleeing accident scenes.
Road accidents are a serious public health and governance concern in India. The country consistently records among the highest road fatality rates globally. The legal framework governing accidents spans two domains: criminal liability under the penal code, and civil/regulatory obligations under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. These two frameworks operate in parallel but address different aspects of driver conduct after a collision.
The concept of "hit and run" in everyday usage refers to any collision after which the driver leaves the scene. However, Indian law uses this term in a narrower, specific sense. Section 161 of the Motor Vehicles Act defines a "hit and run motor accident" as one where the identity of the vehicle cannot be established despite reasonable efforts. This definition has direct consequences for how victims access compensation and how the law classifies a driver's post-accident conduct.
The BNS creates a graduated structure of offences for road accidents. Section 281 covers rash or negligent driving on a public road and carries up to six months' imprisonment, a fine of Rs 1,000, or both. Where such conduct causes grievous hurt, Section 125(b) raises the ceiling to three years' imprisonment and a fine of Rs 10,000. Both offences are bailable, treating the collision primarily as dangerous or careless driving rather than deliberate violence.
Section 106(2) of the BNS was designed to address a specific aggravating circumstance: a driver who causes death through rash and negligent driving and then flees without reporting the incident to a police officer or magistrate. The punishment under this provision can extend to ten years' imprisonment and a fine. This is a significant escalation from the basic negligent driving offence. Parliament's reasoning was clear: fleeing the scene compounds the original wrong. It can delay medical help, destroy evidence, and obstruct justice. The act of fleeing is treated as a separate moral and legal failure, not merely an extension of the original negligence.
However, Section 106(2) was excluded from the notification that brought the rest of the BNS into force. It remains uncommenced and cannot currently be invoked by any court or police officer. …
With reference to anti-defection law in India, consider the following statements:
1.The law specifies that a nominated legislator cannot join any political party within six months of being appointed to the House.
2.The law does not provide any time-frame within which the presiding officer has to decide a defection case.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
With reference to Section 106(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), consider the following statements:
1.It applies when a person causes death through rash and negligent driving and escapes without reporting to a police officer or magistrate.
2.It was brought into force along with the rest of the BNS on 1 July 2024.
3.The maximum punishment under this provision is ten years' imprisonment.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Consider the following pairs of BNS provisions and their key characteristics:
1.Section 281 — Rash or negligent driving; bailable; maximum 6 months imprisonment
2.Section 125(b) — Negligent driving causing grievous hurt; bailable; maximum 3 years imprisonment
3.Section 109 — Attempt to murder; bailable; maximum 10 years imprisonment
4.Section 78 — Stalking; first conviction bailable; subsequent conviction non-bailable
How many of the above pairs are correctly matched?
Which of the following correctly describes the statutory definition of a 'hit and run motor accident' under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988?
With reference to the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, consider the following statements:
1.Section 134 requires a driver involved in an accident to take reasonable steps to secure medical attention for the injured person.
2.Section 187 punishes a driver's failure to comply with the duties imposed after an accident.
3.Section 161 provides compensation to victims of hit and run accidents where the vehicle is identified.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Which of the following best explains why a driver who flees after causing grievous injury (where the victim survives) faces a less serious criminal charge than one whose victim dies, under the current BNS framework?
Want the full note, Prelims Facts & MCQ answers?
Create a free account — takes less than a minute.
Create free account