PolityGS2

Election Commission Faces Internal Dissent Over Roll Revision

Indian Express, The Hindu·2026-09-28

"Election Commission Faces Internal Dissent Over Roll Revision"

Prelims Facts

  • •Article 324 vests the Election Commission with superintendence, direction and control of elections, while Article 326 guarantees universal adult suffrage.
  • •Section 21 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 empowers the ECI to order special revision of electoral rolls.
+4 more facts — sign up free to unlock

Key Terms

Special Intensive Revision (SIR)

a nationwide revision of electoral rolls ordered by the ECI under Section 21 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950.

Article 324

constitutional provision vesting superintendence, direction, and control of elections in the Election Commission of India.

+4 more terms — sign up free to unlock

Study Note

BackgroundCore Concept

Background

The Election Commission of India (ECI) draws its authority from Article 324 of the Constitution, which vests superintendence, direction, and control of elections in a permanent body. Article 326 separately guarantees universal adult suffrage, making free and fair electoral rolls a constitutional obligation. The Commission has operated as a three-member body since 1989, comprising the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and two Election Commissioners (ECs). Decisions are taken collectively, generally by majority vote, under the Election Commission (Conditions of Service of Election Commissioners and Transaction of Business) Act, 1991.

The two offices carry different removal protections. The CEC can be removed only through a process similar to removing a Supreme Court judge. An EC, by contrast, can be removed by the President on the CEC's own recommendation. In T.N. Seshan v. Union of India (1995), the Supreme Court clarified that this asymmetry in removal protection does not give the CEC superior decision-making authority. All three commissioners hold equal weight in collective decisions. In Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India (2023), the Court directed that appointments must go through a broad-based panel rather than unilateral executive choice. Parliament responded with the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, but replaced the Chief Justice of India in the selection panel with a Union Cabinet Minister nominated by the Prime Minister. Critics argue this gives the government two votes out of three and dilutes the independence the judgment intended to protect.

The Topic Explained

The ECI's authority to prepare and revise electoral rolls flows from the Representation of the People Act, 1950. Its Section 21 allows the ECI to order a special revision of rolls when existing rolls are considered deficient. Historically, this power has been used for specific constituencies facing local problems. A nationwide sweep of the kind now under way, called the Special Intensive Revision (SIR), is an unusual application of this provision and has drawn scrutiny about its legal basis and operational scope.

Disputes over the validity of an election result are handled separately. They go to courts through election petitions under the Representation of the People Act, 1951. This distinction matters because the ECI's own role is confined to preparing rolls and conducting elections. It cannot adjudicate disputes about outcomes. …

Sign up free to read the full noteIncludes the rest of The Topic Explained and Current Context

Related PYQs

2012GS1 Prelims

Consider the following statements:

1.Union Territories are not represented in the Rajya Sabha.

2.It is within the purview of the Chief Election Commissioner to adjudicate the election disputes.

3.According to the Constitution of India, the Parliament consists of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha only.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

A1 only
B2 and 3
C1 and 3
DNone
Sign up free to see the answer and explanation
2019GS1 Prelims

Which one of the following suggested that the Governor should be an eminent person from outside the State and should be a detached figure without intense political links or should not have taken part in politics in the recent past?

AFirst Administrative Reforms Commission (1966)
BRajamannar Committee (1969)
CSarkaria Commission (1983)
DNational Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution (2000)
Sign up free to see the answer and explanation

Practice MCQs

Politymedium

As per the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, the Selection Committee that recommends appointments to the Election Commission of India comprises the Prime Minister, the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, and:

AThe Chief Justice of India
BA Union Cabinet Minister nominated by the Prime Minister
CThe Speaker of the Lok Sabha
DThe Chairman of the Rajya Sabha
Sign up to check your answer & see the explanation
Politymedium

Consider the following statements regarding the Election Commission of India: 1. The Chief Election Commissioner can be removed only through a process similar to the removal of a Supreme Court judge. 2. The other Election Commissioners can be removed by the President on the recommendation of the Chief Election Commissioner. 3. The Election Commission has functioned as a multi-member body since the commencement of the Constitution in 1950. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

A1 and 2 only
B2 and 3 only
C1 and 3 only
D1, 2 and 3
Sign up to check your answer & see the explanation
Politymedium

With reference to the right to vote in India, which of the following statements is correct?

AIt is a fundamental right guaranteed under Part III of the Constitution
BIt is a legal right conferred through the Representation of the People Act
CIt is a directive principle enforceable only through legislation
DIt is a constitutional right guaranteed directly under Article 326 without any statutory basis
Sign up to check your answer & see the explanation
Politymedium

With reference to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, consider the following statements: 1. Section 21 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 empowers the Election Commission to order a special revision of electoral rolls. 2. Under the SIR, electors already on the rolls are required to furnish fresh proof of eligibility against decades-old base rolls. 3. The Supreme Court declared the SIR exercise unconstitutional in its ruling. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

A1 only
B1 and 2 only
C2 and 3 only
D1, 2 and 3
Sign up to check your answer & see the explanation
Polityhard

Match List-I (Case/Judgment) with List-II (its core holding) and select the correct answer using the code given below the lists:

List-I:

A.ADM Jabalpur v. Shivakant Shukla

B.Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India

C.Lal Babu Hussein v. Electoral Registration Officer

List-II:

1.Directed an interim selection committee, including the CJI, for appointing Election Commissioners until Parliament legislated

2.Held that the right to life could be suspended during a proclamation of Emergency

3.Held that a voter's name cannot be deleted from the roll without an individually recorded reason

AA-2, B-1, C-3
BA-1, B-2, C-3
CA-2, B-3, C-1
DA-3, B-1, C-2
Sign up to check your answer & see the explanation

Want the full note, Prelims Facts & MCQ answers?

Create a free account — takes less than a minute.

Create free account