"Judicial Reforms and India's Intellectual Property Ecosystem"
TRIPS Agreement
WTO instrument setting minimum global standards for intellectual property protection
Product patent
patent granted on a substance itself, not just its manufacturing process
Institutional economists have long argued that secure property rights and reliable contract enforcement are preconditions for investment. In India, property is protected as a legal right under Article 300A, available to any person and not restricted to citizens, but it lost its status as a Fundamental Right after the 44th Constitutional Amendment. This distinction matters for intellectual property too, since patents, trademarks and copyrights are a special category of property whose value depends entirely on how reliably courts enforce and interpret them.
India's modern IP regime took shape after it joined the World Trade Organisation and accepted the TRIPS Agreement, which required minimum common standards for patents while allowing public-interest flexibilities. The Patents Act, 1970 was substantially amended between 1999 and 2005, with the final phase in 2005 reintroducing product patents for chemical, pharmaceutical and agro-chemical substances. At the same time, Section 3(j) of the Act excludes plants, animals, and seeds produced through essentially biological processes from patentability. Plant varieties instead get a separate protection regime under the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001. Patent appeals were originally heard by the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB), but the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 abolished the IPAB and shifted pending IP appeals directly to High Courts, a change that has pushed far more specialised IP litigation onto courts like Delhi's.
As commercial transactions grew more complex after liberalisation, India's legal system responded in two distinct ways. The first was to strengthen Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), particularly arbitration and mediation, so that time-sensitive commercial disputes could be resolved without the delays of conventional civil trials. The second was legislative: the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 empowers state governments, in consultation with the concerned High Court, to set up dedicated commercial courts for disputes above a specified monetary threshold, alongside targeted amendments to the Code of Civil Procedure meant to speed up case management, evidence, and disposal. …
Consider the following statements:
1.According to the Indian Patents Act, a biological process to create a seed can be patented in India.
2.In India, there is no Intellectual Property Appellate Board.
3.Plant varieties are not eligible to be patented in India.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
What is the position of the Right to Property in India?
Consider the following statements regarding the Patents Act, 1970:
1.The 2005 amendment reintroduced product patents for chemical substances.
2.Section 3(j) permits patenting of plants and animals produced through essentially biological processes.
3.Plant varieties are protected under the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001, not the Patents Act.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Which one of the following best describes the position of the Right to Property in India?
Match List-I (Development) with List-II (Year) and select the correct answer using the code given below:
List-I
A.Product patents reintroduced for chemical substances
B.Commercial Courts Act enacted
C.Intellectual Property Appellate Board abolished
D.Delhi High Court notified IP Division Rules
List-II
1.2005
2.2015
3.2021
4.2022
With reference to the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, consider the following statements:
1.It empowers State Governments, in consultation with the respective High Court, to constitute dedicated Commercial Courts.
2.It introduced amendments to the Code of Civil Procedure specifically applicable to commercial disputes.
3.It established the National Company Law Tribunal for adjudicating commercial disputes.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Consider the following statements:
1.Alternative Dispute Resolution mechanisms like arbitration and mediation aim to decongest civil courts.
2.The Commercial Courts Act, 2015 applies only to disputes exceeding a specified pecuniary value.
3.India's intellectual property regime covers only patents and trademarks, excluding geographical indications and industrial designs.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Want the full note, Prelims Facts & MCQ answers?
Create a free account — takes less than a minute.
Create free account