EconomyGS3

Cabinet Clears Green Energy Corridor Phase-III Transmission Scheme

PIB·2026-10-01

"Cabinet Clears Green Energy Corridor Phase-III Transmission Scheme"

Prelims Facts

  • •GEC-III has a total outlay of Rs. 1,86,405 crore, comprising Rs. 1,36,378 crore for InSTS and Rs. 50,000 crore for BESS.
  • •Central Financial Support under GEC-III is Rs. 54,082 crore.
+4 more facts — sign up free to unlock

Key Terms

Intra-State Transmission System (InSTS)

grid network carrying power within a single state from generation point to injection point.

Inter-State Transmission System (ISTS)

national-level network moving electricity across state boundaries.

+4 more terms — sign up free to unlock

Study Note

BackgroundCore Concept

Background

India's renewable energy expansion faces a structural problem. States richest in solar and wind resources, such as Rajasthan, Gujarat, Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu, are often not the states with the highest electricity demand. Moving power from generation sites to consumption centres requires two types of transmission infrastructure. The Inter-State Transmission System (ISTS) carries power across state boundaries. The Intra-State Transmission System (InSTS) carries power within a single state, from the generation point to the grid injection point. The Green Energy Corridor (GEC) scheme was designed to close this gap by funding grid infrastructure in renewable-rich states.

Green Energy Corridor Scheme Phases
Green Energy Corridor
scheme
GEC-I
2015–16
GEC-II
2021
GEC-III
current

Earlier phases of the GEC established this pattern. GEC-I was approved in 2015-16, partly backed by German financial assistance, to evacuate around 24 GW of renewable power through new intra-state transmission lines. GEC-II followed in 2021, adding further InSTS capacity for roughly 20 GW of evacuation in additional states. Both phases revealed a recurring problem: renewable capacity built without matching transmission capacity leads to curtailment, where clean power that is generated cannot be fed into the grid and is simply wasted.

India's climate commitments have raised the scale of this challenge considerably. The country has pledged 500 GW of non-fossil fuel-based electricity capacity by 2030, a 45% reduction in carbon intensity compared to 2005 levels, and net-zero emissions by 2070. A further milestone of 900 GW of installed non-fossil capacity by 2035 has also been set. Meeting these targets depends as much on transmission and storage infrastructure as on generation capacity itself. This is the context for the newly approved Green Energy Corridor Phase-III (GEC-III).

The Topic Explained

GEC-III funds the InSTS network to enable evacuation of up to 135 GW of renewable energy across participating states and Union Territories. InSTS assets are built and operated by State Transmission Utilities (STUs). This is why the scheme channels central funding into state-level grid infrastructure rather than only the national grid. ISTS, by contrast, is developed and managed at the national level and funded separately.

Strengthening InSTS matters because most new renewable capacity, especially solar and wind parks, comes up in specific pockets within a state. Without local transmission lines, power cannot reach the state grid injection point, let alone travel further to demand centres. Curtailment of renewable power is therefore not just an economic loss. …

Sign up free to read the full noteIncludes the rest of The Topic Explained and Current Context

Related PYQs

2021GS3 Mains

'Investment in infrastructure is essential for more rapid and inclusive economic growth.' Discuss in the light of India's experience.

Sign up free to see the model answer

Practice MCQs

Economyeasy

The Green Energy Corridor Phase-III scheme is explicitly aligned with achieving which target of installed non-fossil fuel based capacity by 2035?

A500 GW
B750 GW
C900 GW
D1000 GW
Sign up to check your answer & see the explanation
Economymedium

Consider the following statements regarding the Green Energy Corridor Phase-III (GEC-III) scheme:

1.It aims to facilitate evacuation of up to 135 GW of renewable energy through the Intra-State Transmission System (InSTS).

2.It provides for deployment of 50 GWh of Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS).

3.The scheme is targeted to be completed by FY 2030-31.

How many of the above statements are correct?

AOnly one
BOnly two
CAll three
DNone
Sign up to check your answer & see the explanation
Economymedium

Match List-I (Transmission project type/activity under GEC-III) with List-II (Associated model) and select the correct answer using the code given below:

List-I

A.Greenfield InSTS projects

B.Brownfield upgradation works

C.Transmission Service Provider operation

List-II

1.Cost Plus Basis (CPB)

2.Build-Own-Operate-Maintain (BOOM)

3.Tariff Based Competitive Bidding (TBCB)

AA-3, B-1, C-2
BA-1, B-3, C-2
CA-2, B-1, C-3
DA-3, B-2, C-1
Sign up to check your answer & see the explanation
Economyeasy

Consider the following statements regarding the objectives of Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) deployed under GEC-III:

1.To address intermittency and congestion in the grid.

2.To manage peak-hour curtailment of renewable energy.

3.To meet electricity demand during non-solar hours.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

A1 and 2 only
B2 and 3 only
C1 and 3 only
D1, 2 and 3
Sign up to check your answer & see the explanation
Economyhard

With reference to the implementation of GEC-III, consider the following statements:

1.State Transmission Utilities are the overall implementing agency.

2.Transmission Service Providers participate under TBCB on a Build-Own-Operate-Maintain model.

3.All projects, including brownfield upgradation, will be implemented only through TBCB.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

A1 only
B1 and 2 only
C2 and 3 only
D1, 2 and 3
Sign up to check your answer & see the explanation

Want the full note, Prelims Facts & MCQ answers?

Create a free account — takes less than a minute.

Create free account