"India's Greenfield Investment Share Outpaces China's, UNCTAD Report Shows"
Greenfield investment
foreign capital used to build a new venture, plant or facility from scratch in another country
Brownfield investment
foreign capital used to acquire, merge with, or expand an already existing firm
Foreign investment reaches a country through two broad channels. A greenfield investment is money a foreign company spends to build a new plant, unit or venture from scratch in another country. A brownfield investment, by contrast, means buying into or merging with a firm that already exists. This distinction matters because a greenfield project usually adds new production capacity and new jobs, while a brownfield deal often just changes ownership of existing assets.
Since the 1991 reforms, India has steadily opened its economy to such flows. The Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), under the Ministry of Commerce, is the nodal body for foreign investment policy, and the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), 1999 provides the legal framework. India's total, or gross, FDI inflow has stayed large in recent years. But separate analysis has shown that India's net FDI, gross inflows minus profit repatriation and outward investment by Indian firms, has fallen sharply even while gross numbers look healthy. This means the headline inflow figure alone does not tell the full story. Looking specifically at new-venture creation, which is what greenfield investment measures, gives a cleaner picture of how much fresh productive capacity is actually being built in India by foreign firms.
The UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), in its Trade and Development Report 2026, measured global greenfield investment flows between 2020 and 2025. Out of a worldwide total of $845.7 billion, India's share stood at 5.7%, more than double China's share of 2.8%, and ahead of Malaysia (4%) and Indonesia (3.8%). This suggests India has become a relatively more attractive site for building new foreign-backed ventures than China over this period.
The report also shows a clear shift in what kind of projects are being built. 'Strategic sectors' grew from 16% to 44% of global greenfield investment between 2020 and 2025, meaning capital is increasingly flowing into technology-intensive industries rather than conventional manufacturing. …
Consider the following statements regarding global greenfield investment during 2020-25, as per a recent UNCTAD report:
1.India's share of global greenfield investment was higher than China's share.
2.Malaysia's share of global greenfield investment was higher than Indonesia's share.
3.The share of strategic sectors in global greenfield investment declined during this period.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Which one of the following best describes a 'greenfield investment'?
With reference to the regional distribution of global strategic-sector investment (2020-25) as reported by UNCTAD, consider the following statements:
1.Europe's share of strategic investment was higher than that of North America.
2.Developing Asia's share of strategic investment was higher than that of North America.
3.Within developing Asia, China, India, Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore are cited as leading investment jurisdictions.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
As per the UNCTAD Trade and Development Report 2026, which of the following strategic sectors attracted the largest share of global greenfield investment during 2020-25?
Match the following with respect to the number of industrial policy measures implemented during 2008-2021, as per UNCTAD data:
Country — Approximate Rank
1.China — A. Highest
2.United States — B. Second highest
3.India — C. Third highest
Select the correct match:
Want the full note, Prelims Facts & MCQ answers?
Create a free account — takes less than a minute.
Create free account