PolityGS2

Supreme Court Declines PIL Seeking Hindi as Court Language

The Hindu·2026-10-13· Read original

"Supreme Court Declines PIL Seeking Hindi as Court Language"

Prelims Facts

  • •Article 348(1)(a) prescribes English as the language for all Supreme Court and High Court proceedings until Parliament legislates otherwise.
  • •Article 348(2) allows a Governor, with the President's prior consent, to authorise Hindi or a State's official language in High Court proceedings. Judgments are excluded.
+4 more facts — sign up free to unlock

Key Terms

Public Interest Litigation (PIL)

a case filed in court on behalf of the public interest, not a personally aggrieved individual

Writ of mandamus

a court order directing a public authority to perform a legal duty it has failed to do

+4 more terms — sign up free to unlock

Study Note

BackgroundCore Concept

Background

India's Constitution does not name any single national language. Article 343 says that Hindi in Devanagari script is the official language of the Union. It also allowed English to continue for official purposes for fifteen years from 1950. Parliament could have changed this, but it did not. Parliament later passed the Official Languages Act, 1963. This Act kept English as a 'subsidiary official language' alongside Hindi. Non-Hindi-speaking regions resisted a single language. They feared one language would dominate a deeply multilingual country.

To protect this diversity, the Constitution lists languages in the Eighth Schedule. Today it names 22 scheduled languages. The 71st Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992 added Konkani, Manipuri and Nepali to this list. This widened the set of languages recognised for official and examination purposes. This schedule matters because courts and legislatures refer to it. They use it when regional-language use is debated. The judiciary follows its own separate constitutional rule.

The Topic Explained

Article 348(1)(a) requires English for all Supreme Court and High Court proceedings. This rule stays in place until Parliament enacts a law providing otherwise. Parliament has never passed such a law. So English remains the default language of record for both courts. This is a deliberate constitutional choice, not an oversight. A common language was seen as necessary for consistency. The judiciary has judges and lawyers from many linguistic backgrounds.

However, Article 348(2) creates a narrow exception for High Courts. It allows a Governor, with the President's prior consent, to authorise Hindi or another State's official language in High Court proceedings. …

Sign up free to read the full noteIncludes the rest of The Topic Explained and Current Context

Related PYQs

2024GS1 Prelims

The Constitution (71st Amendment) Act, 1992 amends the Eighth Schedule to the Constitution to include which of the following languages?

1.Konkani

2.Manipuri

3.Nepali

4.Maithili

Select the correct answer using the code given below:

A1, 2 and 3
B1, 2 and 4
C1, 3 and 4
D2, 3 and 4
Sign up free to see the answer and explanation

Practice MCQs

Politymedium

Consider the following statements regarding Article 348 of the Constitution of India:

1.It prescribes English as the language for proceedings in the Supreme Court and every High Court, unless Parliament provides otherwise by law.

2.A Governor may, with the prior consent of the President, authorise the use of Hindi or another regional language in High Court proceedings.

3.Such authorisation extends to judgments, decrees and orders of the High Court.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

A1 and 2 only
B2 and 3 only
C1 only
D1, 2 and 3
Sign up to check your answer & see the explanation
Politymedium

Match List-I (Constitutional/Statutory provision) with List-II (What it provides) and select the correct answer using the code given below:

List-I

A.Article 343

B.Article 348(1)(a)

C.Article 348(2)

D.Section 7, Official Languages Act, 1963

List-II

1.Allows Hindi/regional language in High Court proceedings with Presidential consent, excluding judgments

2.Prescribes English for Supreme Court and High Court proceedings until Parliament provides otherwise

3.Declares Hindi in Devanagari script as the official language of the Union

4.Permits judgments in Hindi/state language if an authoritative English translation accompanies them

AA-3, B-2, C-1, D-4
BA-2, B-3, C-4, D-1
CA-3, B-1, C-2, D-4
DA-1, B-2, C-3, D-4
Sign up to check your answer & see the explanation
Polityhard

With reference to the Supreme Court's position on the language of its proceedings, consider the following statements:

1.In Madhu Limaye v. Ved Murti (1970), the Court held that English is the language of the Supreme Court.

2.The Supreme Court can be directed by a writ of mandamus to change the language of its proceedings.

3.SUVAS is an AI-based tool used to translate Supreme Court judgments into regional languages.

How many of the above statements are correct?

AOnly one
BOnly two
CAll three
DNone
Sign up to check your answer & see the explanation
Politymedium

Which of the following High Courts currently permit the use of Hindi in proceedings under Section 7 of the Official Languages Act, 1963?

ARajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Bihar
BTamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh
CWest Bengal, Odisha, Assam and Tripura
DPunjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh and Jammu & Kashmir
Sign up to check your answer & see the explanation
Polityeasy

Consider the following statements about the Eighth Schedule to the Constitution of India:

1.It currently lists 22 scheduled languages.

2.The Constitution (71st Amendment) Act, 1992 added Konkani, Manipuri and Nepali to it.

3.Inclusion in the Eighth Schedule automatically makes a language the official language of the Union.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

A1 and 2 only
B2 and 3 only
C1, 2 and 3
D3 only
Sign up to check your answer & see the explanation

Want the full note, Prelims Facts & MCQ answers?

Create a free account — takes less than a minute.

Create free account