Modern India · Topic 8 of 20

The Revolt of 1857

Causes, course, suppression and consequences of the Great Revolt

British Suppression and Reconquest

The Basics

The British, like the rebels, recognised that Delhi held symbolic value. Bahadur Shah II had been accepted as the nominal emperor of the revolt. The British mounted a two-pronged attack on Delhi. One force moved from Calcutta and another from Punjab, which had remained largely peaceful.

Sign up free for the full concept, practice MCQs and PYQs

Why the Revolt of 1857 Failed

The Basics

By 1857 the rebellion had spread across much of North India, from Meerut and Delhi to Kanpur, Lucknow, Jhansi and Bihar. But it never became an all-India uprising. Madras, Bombay, Bengal and Western Punjab stayed largely undisturbed, even though popular sympathy for the rebels existed there. Earlier risings in these regions had already been crushed by the Company, which discouraged fresh revolt.

Sign up free for the full concept, practice MCQs and PYQs

Nature of the Revolt - Historiography Debate

The Basics

British writers first called 1857 a mere army mutiny. Sir John Seeley called it "a wholly unpatriotic and selfish Sepoy Mutiny with no native leadership and no popular support". John Lawrence held a similar view. T.R. Holmes saw it as a conflict between civilisation and barbarism. James Outram called it a Mohammedan conspiracy using Hindu grievances. This view focused only on sepoy discontent. It ignored the many civilians, peasants and landlords who joined in.

Sign up free for the full concept, practice MCQs and PYQs

Consequences and Legacy of the 1857 Revolt

The Basics

By 1858, the revolt was being suppressed, but Company rule itself could not survive what had happened. The uprising had exposed serious failures in the Company's army and administration. The British Parliament decided the Company could no longer be trusted with India.

Sign up free for the full concept, practice MCQs and PYQs